• Corporate Knights
  • Mad Like Tesla
  • Star Column
  • Wiki Me

Cleanbreak.ca logo

Trends, happenings and innovations in the clean technology market

Posts Tagged ‘Toronto’

« Older Entries

District energy still a big, but dwindling, opportunity for fast-growing Toronto

Monday, October 1st, 2012

When Toronto City Council made the decision three years ago to let boutique hotelier Henry Kallan develop a hotel on the grounds of Exhibition Place, the idea was to make the Allstream Centre and Direct Energy Centre more attractive convention venues.

With Exhibition Place now representing the heart of the 2015 Pan American Games, having a hotel on site is even more crucial.

But the hotel represents more to the grounds than just convenient accommodations. For Exhibition Place, it offers an opportunity to expand its reach as an energy service provider.

Years ago, it installed what’s called a tri-generation system. Basically, the system is a natural gas-fired generator that supplies electricity to the Direct Energy Centre. What’s unique, however, is that waste heat recovered from the generator is used to warm the building and run a chiller that’s driven by hot water.

On top of that high-efficiency system, Exhibition Place gets some of its energy needs from wind, geothermal and solar power systems, and it has plenty of room to add more — as well as energy storage — as growth demands.

That’s where the hotel comes into play. Staff from the city’s energy efficiency office realized there was no need for the new building to install its own boilers and chillers. Instead, Exhibition Place could simply pipe surplus heat from the Direct Energy Centre to the hotel.

Kallan was sold. It meant no noisy equipment on the hotel roof, no hassles, and fewer hurdles for a project working under a tight schedule.

But the implications were much broader. It demonstrated that the city-owned grounds had huge potential of becoming the core of an expansive district energy system, one that could supply efficient heating and cooling services to all sorts of new buildings expected to be developed in the surrounding area over the coming years.

“All of that is fair game. We have big plans for that area,” says Fernando Carou, a senior engineer from the city’s energy-efficiency office who specializes in district-energy development. “It’s the approach we should have taken 50 years ago in this city, which is to integrate energy into the way the city grows and develops itself.”

Jose Etcheverry, an associate professor of environmental studies at York University, echoes that observation. “We have a situation here where municipalities expand without any thought whatsoever about energy.”

This contrasts with northern Europe, where district energy systems make a major contribution to national power and heat production. In Denmark, about 60 per cent of buildings are supplied by district energy. Narrow that to Copenhagen and it rises to 98 per cent.

There are some visible exceptions in Ontario. Toronto has Enwave, which supplies heating and cooling to 140 buildings in the downtown core. North of the city, Markham District Energy began supplying energy services to the surrounding community in 2000. It now has three combined heat and power plants serving the area’s buildings, with a fourth plant under construction.

“Markham has shown the great advantage that a little bit of energy planning can put on the table,” says Etcheverry, adding that Guelph and Hamilton are also showing leadership. “Enwave, in many ways, opened people’s minds about the potential.”

Carou says Toronto has missed a big opportunity by not embracing district energy earlier. He points, for example, to the Humber Bay Shores cluster of high-rise condominium buildings that sprung up along the lake west of the downtown core, or development around the intersection of Leslie St. and Shepherd Ave.

These areas could have been perfect for building district energy into planning. “But they have nothing,” he says.

Still, missed opportunity doesn’t mean zero opportunity. The city has about 200 new high-rise buildings planned for construction over the next several years, part of the megatrend of diversification and urbanization.

“There’s incredibly explosive growth happening,” says Carou. “We just have to act quickly.”

To help focus the city’s efforts, his office commissioned a report that prioritizes energy “action zones” or “nodes” where district energy (including renewables and targeted energy storage) would make most sense — low-hanging fruit ready for the taking.

He presented a map of 27 action zones while speaking at a seminar last week organized by York’s Sustainable Energy Initiative. Exhibition Place was on the map. So was York University, which is rich in surplus land that private developers are drooling over.

Carou says going the district energy route appears a “win-win” for York. The university can make money leasing the land, earn additional revenues selling energy services from their own bulked up systems, and improve their own energy security in the process. A covenant on land leases could make it a condition of development.

For a university traditionally strong in environmental science and engineering curriculum, the facility could also potentially be a valuable training ground for students.

“We don’t have definitive plans yet,” said Brad Cochrane, director of energy management at York, who also spoke at last week’s seminar.

The option is currently being studied, he said, while also acknowledging that time is of the essence. “We have to make a decision soon if we’re going to go that way or not, otherwise it’s going to be more difficult to do later.”

Tyler Hamilton, author of Mad Like Tesla, writes weekly about green energy and clean technologies.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Tags: district energy, Exhibition Place, Toronto
Posted in biofuels, cleantech, conservation, efficiency, emissions, energy storage, grid, ontario, solar, wind | 1 Comment »

Toronto needs to take a serious look at turning its hard-to-recycle trash into energy

Friday, February 11th, 2011

My Clean Break column today in the Toronto Star talks about why the city, which under previous Mayor David Miller practically banned discussion of energy-from-waste, should open its mind and have an honest dialogue about options for turning the city’s hard-to-recycle solid waste into useful products, such as electricity, ethanol or green chemicals.

They’re doing it in Edmonton with Enerkem, which is turning sorted municipal solid waste into ethanol. They’re doing it in Ottawa with Plasco Energy, which is turning residual municipal waste into syngas that’s used for generating electricity. Trash giant Waste Management, an investor in Enerkem, has been investing heavily in technologies that can cleanly convert waste into useful chemicals and fuels in a safe way that releases virtually no emissions into the atmosphere — at least not, obviously, until any end fuel product is burned. But this fuel product would be displacing a fossil fuel using materials that might otherwise degrade in a landfill and release methane or contaminate groundwater.

This is an area where I part with many of my friends in the environmental community, and believe me, I’ve had my share of debates over a beer. But the landfill option is not better, in my view, and while I fully support waste diversion programs I don’t believe we can ever get to 100 per cent diversion. There’s a lot of wood waste, clothing, unrecyclable plastics, and even certain paper and plastic products can only be recycled so many times. What happens with this garbage? Advanced energy-from-waste technologies, like those being built by Enerkem and Plasco, can help municipalities manage their waste in their own back yard and get a source of energy in return.

I’m not saying we should drink the Kool-Aid, no questions asked. But at the same time, I’m a believer that the technology has changed over the years, the economics have improved, and some systems being piloted and built for commercial use today are dramatically different than the dirty incinerators built in the 1970s. Skepticism is fine, and encouraged, but not when it’s accompanied by outright dismissal or repeated attempts to compare today’s technology with what stirred up controversy 20 years ago.

It’s a conversation Toronto needs to have.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Tags: energy-from-waste, Enerkem, Plasco Energy, Toronto
Posted in Energy-From-Waste (EFW) | 4 Comments »

Toronto mayoral candidates talk about greening the city’s economy

Tuesday, August 31st, 2010

The debate, hosted by Toronto Greenhouse and moderated by yours truly, took place this evening. Please come back after noon on Wednesday for access to a transcript of the event and to post any followup questions you may have. Candidates have been invited to visit this site and answer questions. Stay tuned.

UPDATE: After a sincere attempt to transcribe last evening’s Green Government debate, I have decided to not proceed because certain parts of the debate were inaudible on my digital recorder. It would be unfair to post a transcript in which the comments of certain candidates are not accurately recorded. My apologies. I will, however, soon have access to a link where people can watch the full video of the debate.

In the meantime, I will post here the four questions I asked and candidates have the opportunity, if they choose, to respond more clearly and concisely on this blog. Their responses can be sent to tyler@cleanbreak.ca and will be posted soon after they are received. (NOTE: Sarah Thomson has replied. Read below for her comments.)

Question #1: What are the top three environmental issues facing the city today and how do you plan to address them?

Question #2: Building on past efforts, how can a major municipality like Toronto do a better job of reducing its greenhouse-gas emissions?

Question #3: Can the green economy be a future economic engine for Toronto? If so, in which areas should Toronto focus its efforts and how would you, as mayor, support emerging green businesses?

Question #4: Where does each candidate stand on the use of energy-from-waste technologies, both as a way to manage municipal waste and generate electricity for the city?

Here are some links to coverage of last evening’s event — the Toronto Star, the Globe and Mail, and the National Post (and here).

Also, check out Toronto Star columnist Catherine Porter’s account of the evening on Twitter.

If you attended the debate, I welcome your comments. Who won? Which particular responses stood out?

To read candidate answers received so far click for more… (more…)

Share/Save/Bookmark

Tags: George Smitherman, green economy, green government, Joe Pantalone, mayoral debate, Rob Ford, Rocco Rossi, Sarah Thomson, Toronto
Posted in green politics | 3 Comments »

The New Entrepreneurs vs. Canada’s natural resources economy

Monday, June 21st, 2010

The G20 is set to get started in Toronto this weekend and it’s going to be a zoo. Canadians will end up spending $1 billion on security alone, and that’s just for a few days. The city’s downtown core will be in lockdown. Trees in the area have been removed for fear that protesters will use branches as weapons. Streets and businesses will be closed. Traffic around the city will be chaos. This, all so a bunch of leaders can get a bit of face time and likely accomplish very little.

Fun, eh?

So, after visiting Toronto, what will world leaders and foreign press walk away with? Probably the image they’ve always held of Canada — a large country with natural resources galore. Lumber, oil, natural gas, minerals, metals, fresh water. Will they walk away with the impression that Canada is an innovative nation that’s leading the world in creating a green economy? In a word, no. In fact, one of the key drivers of green economics — climate change — wasn’t even going to be part of the G20 agenda until leaders from the United Nations, the European Union and Mexico issued public protests. Canada’s current federal government is more than happy with the status quo.

Canada’s dependence on its natural resources will only continue to stifle innovation in this country, according to venture capitalist Andrew Heintzman in his new book The New Entrepreneurs (check out my Clean Break column for more info on this). But it’s not like this innovation doesn’t exist. In fact, many of them are designed to improve the productivity and efficiency of Canada’s natural resource-based sectors. Heintzman’s book goes into great detail profiling dozens of the entrepreneurs and clean technology companies that are the seeds of a green economy in Canada, and while some of these risk takers are world leaders in what they do, they’re based in a country that’s failing so far to see the opportunity they represent.

The issue is close to Heintzman’s heart. He is co-founder and CEO of Investeco Capital, a Toronto based venture capital firm that funds emerging clean technology companies. He’s also chair of Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty’s climate change advisory panel. “Canada has virtually no national strategy on renewable energy; no plans for high-speed rail lines in development; no national smart-grid plans of any consequences; no greenhouse gas emissions reductions goals of any meaning; and no energy efficiency goals,” he writes. “In short, Canada is lacking a coherent national strategy on the most important economic questions of our time – questions that will define our future competiveness, productivity and prosperity.”

Questions that are unlikely to be raised this weekend.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Tags: Andrew Heintzman, G20, The New Entrepreneurs, Toronto
Posted in green politics, Uncategorized | Comments Off

Zero-interest loans to help Toronto MASH sectors get efficient

Tuesday, November 18th, 2008

The City of Toronto has launched two funds that will make it easier for schools, churches, hospitals and other not-for-profit sectors to reduce their carbon footprint.

The $42 million Toronto Energy Conservation Fund and the $20 million Toronto Green Energy Fund, created as part of the city’s climate action plan, make available zero-interest loans for projects that aim to make buildings more energy efficient or bigger users of green energy. Up to $1 million will be available for individual projects, on the condition that the funding represents no more than 49 per cent of total project costs. Both new and retrofit building projects, including those involving municipal buildings, are eligible.

It’s a great idea, particularly during the current credit crunch, and we need to see more of the same. In fact, the city might want to check out what’s going on in Berkeley, Calif., where residents can install solar panels and pay for them over 20 years through a line item on their property tax bill. A company called Renewable Funding is administering the program, which could apply to a range of renewable energy and efficiency measures.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Tags: Berkeley, conservation, energy efficiency, financing, Renewable Funding, Toronto, zero-interest
Posted in efficiency | Comments Off

« Older Entries
  • Tyler Hamilton

    tyler Tyler Hamilton is associate publisher and editor-in-chief of Corporate Knights magazine and former business columnist for the Toronto Star. This blog is a personal project started in April 2005.


    Check out my new book Mad Like Tesla: Underdog Inventors and Their Relentless Pursuit of Clean Energy, published by ECW Press.


    Follow Go2CleanBreak on Twitter

     Subscribe in a reader

    Subscribe by Email


    If you would like to inquire about speaking engagements, research and writing services, or general consulting services please contact Tyler at cleantechreporter(AT)gmail.com


  • Categories

    • biofuels (68)
    • carbon capture (35)
    • cleantech (86)
    • conservation (50)
    • education (13)
    • efficiency (102)
    • electric vehicles (97)
    • emissions (126)
    • energy storage (54)
    • Energy-From-Waste (EFW) (46)
    • events (5)
    • financing (27)
    • fuel cells (25)
    • geothermal (27)
    • green politics (89)
    • grid (45)
    • Main Page (1067)
    • nuclear (31)
    • ontario (185)
    • peak oil (18)
    • solar (121)
    • transportation (43)
    • Uncategorized (206)
    • water (33)
    • wave power (14)
    • wind (90)
  • Latest Comments

    • Rebecca Black: Ontario has it’s own ‘solar bond’ – up to $100,000 per investor, 5 year term,...
    • steve lapp: Cars are seen as problems, not solutions by many people now, including many of the current group of...
    • Paul C from Austin: I have read this before- most interesting. I wonder, especially for the younger segment, how much...
    • Andrea: I can see what you are saying, and certainly they needed to find a way to bring the municipalities back into...
    • steve lapp: Good summary of the changing RE landscape in Ontario. I think however, that it is unfortunate that the...
  • Pages

    • About
  • Archives

    • 2013
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
    • 2012
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2011
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2010
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2009
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2008
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2007
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2006
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2005
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December

Clean Break is proudly powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).