<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Clean Break &#187; hydro</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cleanbreak.ca/tag/hydro/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cleanbreak.ca</link>
	<description>Trends, happenings and innovations in the clean technology market</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 04:01:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Continental first: Ontario proposes ambitious feed-in tariffs for wind, solar, biogas/biomass and hydro</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2009/03/12/continental-first-ontario-proposes-ambitious-feed-in-tariffs-for-renewables/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2009/03/12/continental-first-ontario-proposes-ambitious-feed-in-tariffs-for-renewables/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[green politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ontario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biogas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feed-in tariff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydro]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanbreak.ca/?p=1566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Click here for release. Highlights: 80.2 cents per kilowatt-hour for rooftop solar. 19 cents for offshore wind of any size (first jurisdiction in N.A. to set price) 13.5 cents for onshore wind of any size 14.7 for biogas under 5 MW. 44.3 cents for 10-MW-plus solar, sliding to 71.3 cents as projects scale down to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Click here for <a href="http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/March2009/12/c8365.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.newswire.ca');" target="_blank">release</a>.</p>
<p>Highlights:</p>
<ul>
<li>80.2 cents per kilowatt-hour for rooftop solar.</li>
<li>19 cents for offshore wind of any size (first jurisdiction in N.A. to set price)</li>
<li>13.5 cents for onshore wind of any size</li>
<li>14.7 for biogas under 5 MW.</li>
<li>44.3 cents for 10-MW-plus solar, sliding to 71.3 cents as projects scale down to 10 kilowatts.</li>
</ul>
<p>The government will commence eight-week consultation process and expects to have the prices in effect this summer. <strong>More to come</strong>&#8230;.</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE:</strong> Here&#8217;s an article I <a href="http://www.thestar.com/Business/article/601464" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.thestar.com');" target="_blank">just filed to the <em>Toronto Star&#8217;s</em> Web site</a>. It contains more info regarding the proposed tariffs. Ontario introduced basic feed-in tariffs two years ago under its standard offer program, but project size was capped at 10 megawatts. The new advanced feed-in tariff program lifts the cap (though solar is still capped at 10 megawatts). It also offers higher prices for smaller projects, such as community-based wind and solar projects or residential solar. Most groups seem happy with the pricing with the exception of large solar developers, who despite getting a 2-cent increase to 44 cents per kilowatt-hour still argue it&#8217;s not enough to make projects economical (especially if you factor in poor Canadian-U.S. exchange rate and persistently tight credit markets).</p>
<p>Of course it remains to be seen whether this new feed-in tariff structure, despite being generous and being first on the continent, will be enough to attract investment, development, manufacturing and jobs. Curious to hear viewpoints on this.  Michigan introduced a bill last year that proposed similar advanced tariffs but it never got passed. Hawaii has proposed less ambitious tariffs, but Ontario&#8217;s will be first to go into effect and will be the most ambitious to date.</p>
<p class="addtoany_share_save_container">
    <a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" onmouseover="a2a_show_dropdown(this)" onmouseout="a2a_onMouseOut_delay()" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?sitename=Clean%20Break&amp;siteurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cleanbreak.ca%2F&amp;linkname=Continental%20first%3A%20Ontario%20proposes%20ambitious%20feed-in%20tariffs%20for%20wind%2C%20solar%2C%20biogas%2Fbiomass%20and%20hydro&amp;linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cleanbreak.ca%2F2009%2F03%2F12%2Fcontinental-first-ontario-proposes-ambitious-feed-in-tariffs-for-renewables%2F" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.addtoany.com');"><img src="http://www.cleanbreak.ca/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_120_16.gif" width="120" height="16" alt="Share/Save/Bookmark"/></a>
    <script type="text/javascript">
		a2a_linkname="Continental first: Ontario proposes ambitious feed-in tariffs for wind, solar, biogas/biomass and hydro";
		a2a_linkurl="http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2009/03/12/continental-first-ontario-proposes-ambitious-feed-in-tariffs-for-renewables/";
						    </script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="http://static.addtoany.com/menu/page.js"></script>

	</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2009/03/12/continental-first-ontario-proposes-ambitious-feed-in-tariffs-for-renewables/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

