<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Clean Break &#187; ACR 1000</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cleanbreak.ca/tag/acr-1000/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cleanbreak.ca</link>
	<description>Trends, happenings and innovations in the clean technology market</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 04:01:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Cost of new nuclear in Ontario? Anywhere from $7,400 to $10,800 per kilowatt, depending on your appetite for risk</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2009/07/14/cost-of-new-nuclear-in-ontario-anywhere-from-7400-to-10800-per-kilowatt-depending-on-your-appetite-for-risk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2009/07/14/cost-of-new-nuclear-in-ontario-anywhere-from-7400-to-10800-per-kilowatt-depending-on-your-appetite-for-risk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 01:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[nuclear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ontario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACR 1000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AECL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Areva]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanbreak.ca/?p=1734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a story in today&#8217;s Toronto Star that pegs the price of two 1,200 megawatt ACR 1000 reactors from Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd. at $26 billion, including all balance of plant costs. That would put the cost at $10,800 (Canadian) per kilowatt, far beyond previous projections. Really far. The story was based on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a <a href="http://www.thestar.com/comment/columnists/article/665644" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.thestar.com');" target="_blank">story in today&#8217;s <em>Toronto Star</em> </a>that pegs the price of two 1,200 megawatt ACR 1000 reactors from Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd. at $26 billion, including all balance of plant costs. That would put the cost at $10,800 (Canadian) per kilowatt, far beyond previous projections. Really far. The story was based on information supplied by sources close to the bidding, including one directly involved on a bidding team. It also found that the Areva bid &#8212; involving two 1,600 EPR reactors &#8212; came in at $23.6 billion, or roughly $7,400 per kilowatt. It was deemed non-compliant, however, likely because Areva wouldn&#8217;t guarantee the price (which explains the lower price, maybe?).</p>
<p>I can understand the Areva price (apparently it&#8217;s based on a similar bid for a plant being planned in Maryland), but like many I&#8217;m personally shocked at the high amount of the AECL bid. Yes, I wrote the story but like many have a difficult time believing such a high number. My sources, however, are quite credible.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve yet to get any reply from the government or industry that denies or confirms these numbers. Premier Dalton McGuinty was scrummed by reporters earlier this morning and he <a href="http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/article/665911" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.thestar.com');" target="_blank">didn&#8217;t refute the numbers</a>, saying only that the process is confidential. McGuinty could have said something general like &#8220;The numbers are far off&#8221; or &#8220;Not even close&#8221; to dispute the article, but he didn&#8217;t. The $26 billion figure, by the way, almost completely consumes the budget for Ontario&#8217;s 20-year nuclear expansion strategy, as estimated in 2007 by the Ontario Power Authority. That budget was to cover a new build at Darlington and at least two refurbishment projects.</p>
<p class="addtoany_share_save_container">
    <a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" onmouseover="a2a_show_dropdown(this)" onmouseout="a2a_onMouseOut_delay()" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?sitename=Clean%20Break&amp;siteurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cleanbreak.ca%2F&amp;linkname=Cost%20of%20new%20nuclear%20in%20Ontario%3F%20Anywhere%20from%20%247%2C400%20to%20%2410%2C800%20per%20kilowatt%2C%20depending%20on%20your%20appetite%20for%20risk&amp;linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cleanbreak.ca%2F2009%2F07%2F14%2Fcost-of-new-nuclear-in-ontario-anywhere-from-7400-to-10800-per-kilowatt-depending-on-your-appetite-for-risk%2F" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.addtoany.com');"><img src="http://www.cleanbreak.ca/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_120_16.gif" width="120" height="16" alt="Share/Save/Bookmark"/></a>
    <script type="text/javascript">
		a2a_linkname="Cost of new nuclear in Ontario? Anywhere from $7,400 to $10,800 per kilowatt, depending on your appetite for risk";
		a2a_linkurl="http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2009/07/14/cost-of-new-nuclear-in-ontario-anywhere-from-7400-to-10800-per-kilowatt-depending-on-your-appetite-for-risk/";
						    </script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="http://static.addtoany.com/menu/page.js"></script>

	</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2009/07/14/cost-of-new-nuclear-in-ontario-anywhere-from-7400-to-10800-per-kilowatt-depending-on-your-appetite-for-risk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

