gambling insider
  • Corporate Knights
  • Mad Like Tesla
  • Star Column
  • Wiki Me

Cleanbreak.ca logo

Trends, happenings and innovations in the clean technology market
« The challenge of life-cycle analysis in a world of rapid innovation
Nuclear power “renaissance” not the expansion boom the industry expected »

100% coal-to-biomass conversion reduces GHGs by 92 per cent: study

Ontario is making solid progress with its plan to convert some of its coal-fired power plants to biomass. And not just co-firing, like what many U.S. jurisdictions are considering, but full out 100 per cent biomass burn. It will prove a key part of Ontario’s greenhouse-gas reduction strategy. A new University of Toronto study has concluded that converting coal-fired units at the Nanticoke and Atikokan plants to burning wood pellets would reduce GHGs by roughly 92 per cent, and this is based on a full lifecycle analysis. On top of that, it would create a local biomass supply chain — for harvesting, pelletization, transportation, etc. — and local jobs that simply don’t exist under a coal-only regime. OPG also plans to operate the plants as peakers, meaning they could be used to help manage renewables (i.e. there would be less natural gas required to perform this balancing act).

I have an update on Ontario Power Generation’s biomass strategy in today’s Clean Break column. OPG will likely convert Atikokan to 100 per cent biomass by 2012, with some units at Nanticoke likely to follow a year later. Lambton and Thunder Bay plants are also being considered. The OPG executive heading up the transition, Chris Young, says the company is seriously investigating a fuel pellet mixture with both wood and agricultural residues (or dedicated crops, like switchgrass). OPG figures that coal plants converted to burning biomass will likely operate for another 10 years before decommissioning, at which point the pellet supply chain will be firmly established and the move to build a distributed fleet of newer biomass-burning plants can begin.

And what is U of T’s estimated cost of supplying electricity from an existing coal plant converted to burning 100 per cent biomass? Roughly 12 cents per kilowatt-hour, which excludes the impact of carbon prices. Given that natural gas won’t stay low forever and will eventually be subject to carbon pricing, this makes the biomass option competitive (also with wind and nuclear) and at the same time is a winner when it comes to local green-collar job creation.

If OPG can pull this off, it would be another Ontario first — and something other jurisdictions can learn from.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Tags: coal-to-biomass, Heather MacLean, Ontario Power Generation, University of Toronto

This entry was posted on Monday, February 1st, 2010 at 3:52 pm and is filed under biofuels, emissions, ontario. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

5 Responses to “100% coal-to-biomass conversion reduces GHGs by 92 per cent: study”

  1. Ontario continues converting coal plants to use biomass as fuel | Politics in the Zeros Says:
    February 1st, 2010 at 9:24 pm

    [...] What a great idea. Use existing coal plants to burn biomass as fuel instead. Ontario will have one plant completely converted by 2012, with more coming. The biomass comes from leftovers from foresting and agriculture, with switchgrass a possibility as a crop too. Share: [...]

  2. Bob McCallum Says:
    February 1st, 2010 at 9:32 pm

    While biomass is viewed as GHG neutral over it’s lifecycle, doesn’t the large-scale burning of wood accelerate the release of GHGs from decades (depending on the plant species – some trees take hundreds of years to fully decompose) to a very short time period? Is that taken into consideration in the design and operation of biomass programs? This also relates to the carbon-friendliness of the use of wood-fired stoves and furnaces for homes.

  3. Bob McCallum Says:
    February 1st, 2010 at 9:35 pm

    By the way, I recently discovered your blog and am very impressed with your coverage and editorial.

  4. Marlowe Johnson Says:
    February 2nd, 2010 at 12:28 pm

    I’m surprised you didn’t mention the benefits of going 100% biomass vs. co-firing (i.e. can recover and use ash), as this is something you and David Benson have been harping on (correctly IMO) for quite so time no?

  5. Jim Prall Says:
    March 3rd, 2010 at 12:49 pm

    I tried to follow the link to the University of Toronto study, but every browser I tried came back with a message from pubs.acs.org saying that I did not have cookies enabled, and they are required.

    Looking closer at the URL in your article, it has “?cookieSet=1″ at the end. I tried trimming that part off, and I was able to access the article. Here’s the shortened URL that works for me:

    http://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/es902555a

    You might want to update the article to change this so readers can follow the link. Great find, by the way. This idea occurred to me in the past, and seemed worth pursuing if only to take advantage of existing investment in complete working power plants and transmission grid connections. I just didn’t think I could get OPG’s attention for my little thought. Fortunately, I wasn’t alone in wondering about this. Terrific to see Ontario making such innovative moves. Let’s hope these ideas pan out well here, and get noticed around North America and the world as ready-to-go alternatives to coal.

  • Tyler Hamilton

    tyler Tyler Hamilton is editor-in-chief of Corporate Knights magazine and a business columnist for the Toronto Star, Canada's largest daily newspaper. In addition to this Clean Break blog, Tyler writes a weekly column of the same name that discusses trends, happenings and innovators in the clean technology and green energy market. This blog is a personal project started in April 2005. It is not an official blog of the newspaper.


    Check out my new book Mad Like Tesla: Underdog Inventors and Their Relentless Pursuit of Clean Energy, published by ECW Press.


    Follow Go2CleanBreak on Twitter

     Subscribe in a reader

    Subscribe by Email


    If you would like to inquire about speaking engagements, research and writing services, or general consulting services please contact Tyler at cleantechreporter(AT)gmail.com


  • Categories

    • biofuels (59)
    • carbon capture (31)
    • cleantech (65)
    • conservation (34)
    • education (9)
    • efficiency (74)
    • electric vehicles (85)
    • emissions (105)
    • energy storage (38)
    • Energy-From-Waste (EFW) (36)
    • events (4)
    • financing (23)
    • fuel cells (19)
    • geothermal (20)
    • green politics (81)
    • grid (35)
    • Main Page (1066)
    • nuclear (26)
    • ontario (146)
    • peak oil (16)
    • solar (108)
    • transportation (32)
    • Uncategorized (189)
    • water (25)
    • wave power (10)
    • wind (76)
  • Latest Comments

    • Ralph Perez: It might be an advantage to include a solar charging option for the battery. 1-In the form of a panel in...
    • Enoch: This is completely off subject, but I would be interested in comments regarding this article:...
    • Bruce Sharp: In spite of what I might have said recently, I don’t see our exchanges as laughable. I find your...
    • Tyler: If I didn’t understand and accept the need for objective measurement and peer-to-peer comparison, I...
    • Bruce Sharp: Tyler, With all do respect (this is admittedly a phrase used just before uttering something that might...
  • Pages

    • About
  • Archives

    • 2012
      • January
      • February
    • 2011
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2010
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2009
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2008
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2007
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2006
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2005
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December

Clean Break is proudly powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).