<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wow! Clean coal, CCS shunned in Copenhagen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2009/12/17/wow-clean-coal-ccs-shunned-in-copenhagen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2009/12/17/wow-clean-coal-ccs-shunned-in-copenhagen/</link>
	<description>Trends, happenings and innovations in the clean technology market</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:28:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antony</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2009/12/17/wow-clean-coal-ccs-shunned-in-copenhagen/comment-page-1/#comment-8506</link>
		<dc:creator>Antony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 20:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanbreak.ca/?p=1976#comment-8506</guid>
		<description>Clean coal and CCS don&#039;t exist.  Charitably, they&#039;re long-term goals.  Less so, they&#039;re lobbying/marketing buzzwords.  Given all the technologically/economically feasible approaches to reducing carbon emissions, I&#039;m glad they&#039;re leaning away from subsidizing this particular R&amp;D fantasy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clean coal and CCS don&#8217;t exist.  Charitably, they&#8217;re long-term goals.  Less so, they&#8217;re lobbying/marketing buzzwords.  Given all the technologically/economically feasible approaches to reducing carbon emissions, I&#8217;m glad they&#8217;re leaning away from subsidizing this particular R&amp;D fantasy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

