<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If you look beyond the North American rhetoric, China is walking the cleantech talk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2009/12/14/if-you-look-beyond-the-north-american-rhetoric-chinas-not-walking-the-cleantech-talk-at-least-more-than-us/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2009/12/14/if-you-look-beyond-the-north-american-rhetoric-chinas-not-walking-the-cleantech-talk-at-least-more-than-us/</link>
	<description>Trends, happenings and innovations in the clean technology market</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:28:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Quail</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2009/12/14/if-you-look-beyond-the-north-american-rhetoric-chinas-not-walking-the-cleantech-talk-at-least-more-than-us/comment-page-1/#comment-8465</link>
		<dc:creator>David Quail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanbreak.ca/?p=1966#comment-8465</guid>
		<description>But it makes is feel so much better about ourselves when we know how evil and filthy China is!!!!

Whether China, India or your next door neighbor is &quot;environmentally unfriendly&quot; or not is irrelevant but often used in discussing environmental policy.  IMO, this logic stopped making sense around the age of 8.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But it makes is feel so much better about ourselves when we know how evil and filthy China is!!!!</p>
<p>Whether China, India or your next door neighbor is &#8220;environmentally unfriendly&#8221; or not is irrelevant but often used in discussing environmental policy.  IMO, this logic stopped making sense around the age of 8.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

