<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fusion power on the cheap? Not so outlandish&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2009/04/20/fusion-power-on-the-cheap-not-so-outlandish/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2009/04/20/fusion-power-on-the-cheap-not-so-outlandish/</link>
	<description>Trends, happenings and innovations in the clean technology market</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:38:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul C from Austin</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2009/04/20/fusion-power-on-the-cheap-not-so-outlandish/comment-page-1/#comment-5221</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul C from Austin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanbreak.ca/?p=1627#comment-5221</guid>
		<description>I think the quote from your article sums it up the best- &#039;high risk, high gain.&#039;  But very well worth it.  I still believe that we will need some sort of consistant, reliable baseline power generation, and that it should probably be nuclear, to go with renewable energies- obviously, though, if fusion reactors could become a reality, it would be exponentially greater than our current Nuclear Reactor technologies.  I wish them success in their pursuit of thinking outside the box- if only I had a spare $50 million lying around;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the quote from your article sums it up the best- &#8216;high risk, high gain.&#8217;  But very well worth it.  I still believe that we will need some sort of consistant, reliable baseline power generation, and that it should probably be nuclear, to go with renewable energies- obviously, though, if fusion reactors could become a reality, it would be exponentially greater than our current Nuclear Reactor technologies.  I wish them success in their pursuit of thinking outside the box- if only I had a spare $50 million lying around;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fusion power on the cheap? Not so outlandish… &#171; Energy Consulting</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2009/04/20/fusion-power-on-the-cheap-not-so-outlandish/comment-page-1/#comment-5213</link>
		<dc:creator>Fusion power on the cheap? Not so outlandish… &#171; Energy Consulting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanbreak.ca/?p=1627#comment-5213</guid>
		<description>[...] FUENTE - CleanBreak - 20/04/09 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] FUENTE &#8211; CleanBreak &#8211; 20/04/09 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
