• Corporate Knights
  • Mad Like Tesla
  • Star Column
  • Wiki Me

Cleanbreak.ca logo

Trends, happenings and innovations in the clean technology market
« The “wind man of India” and where he sees the industry going
EEStor announces permittivity certification… now what? »

Fusion power on the cheap? Not so outlandish…

My feature in the Toronto Star today is about General Fusion, a Vancouver-area startup that believes it can build a prototype of a nuclear fusion reactor for $50 million within four years. While the multibillion-dollar ITER and U.S. fusion programs are using costly lasers and electromagnets to achieve “net gain” — that is, creating a fusion reaction that releases more energy than put it — the folks at General Fusion are cleverly pursuing a mechanical approach that uses concentrated sound waves to compress a deuterium-tritium plasma and trigger a fusion reaction. The key, as you’ll see, is the use of precision digital controls that simply didn’t exist back in the 1970s when the idea of magnetized target fusion was first explored.

You can read the article for more details and a deeper explanation of how it works. General Fusion recently secured $13.9 million from Sustainable Development Technology Canada so it can pursue its prototype development, contingent on the company raising another $30 million or so from private investors. SDTC‘s average deal size is around $3 million so the fact it’s giving General Fusion nearly five times that amount speaks to the credibility of what it’s doing.

My readers would know that I love an underdog, and this certaintly counts as one of them. Unfortunately, Canada doesn’t have a fusion program and all expertise and experience around nuclear technology is around fission reactors — i.e. Candu. But if General Fusion can show four years from now that its approach can achieve net-gain, the company will have no problem attracting investment and attention from some of the world’s best nuclear minds.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Tags: General Fusion, ITER, Magnetized Target Fusion, Michel Laberge, net gain, nuclear fusion

This entry was posted on Monday, April 20th, 2009 at 12:12 pm and is filed under nuclear. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

2 Responses to “Fusion power on the cheap? Not so outlandish…”

  1. Fusion power on the cheap? Not so outlandish… « Energy Consulting Says:
    April 21st, 2009 at 11:49 am

    [...] FUENTE – CleanBreak – 20/04/09 [...]

  2. Paul C from Austin Says:
    April 22nd, 2009 at 10:55 am

    I think the quote from your article sums it up the best- ‘high risk, high gain.’ But very well worth it. I still believe that we will need some sort of consistant, reliable baseline power generation, and that it should probably be nuclear, to go with renewable energies- obviously, though, if fusion reactors could become a reality, it would be exponentially greater than our current Nuclear Reactor technologies. I wish them success in their pursuit of thinking outside the box- if only I had a spare $50 million lying around;-)

  • Tyler Hamilton

    tyler Tyler Hamilton is associate publisher and editor-in-chief of Corporate Knights magazine and former business columnist for the Toronto Star. This blog is a personal project started in April 2005.


    Check out my new book Mad Like Tesla: Underdog Inventors and Their Relentless Pursuit of Clean Energy, published by ECW Press.


    Follow Go2CleanBreak on Twitter

     Subscribe in a reader

    Subscribe by Email


    If you would like to inquire about speaking engagements, research and writing services, or general consulting services please contact Tyler at cleantechreporter(AT)gmail.com


  • Categories

    • biofuels (68)
    • carbon capture (35)
    • cleantech (86)
    • conservation (49)
    • education (13)
    • efficiency (102)
    • electric vehicles (96)
    • emissions (126)
    • energy storage (54)
    • Energy-From-Waste (EFW) (46)
    • events (5)
    • financing (26)
    • fuel cells (25)
    • geothermal (27)
    • green politics (87)
    • grid (45)
    • Main Page (1067)
    • nuclear (31)
    • ontario (183)
    • peak oil (18)
    • solar (120)
    • transportation (42)
    • Uncategorized (204)
    • water (33)
    • wave power (14)
    • wind (89)
  • Latest Comments

    • kevin legrand: Following the microgrid scene, I have always wondered about batteries vs hydrogen in terms of storage...
    • Kl: Ontario should be discussing pumped storage options.. Flywheels, temporal power, and batteries, ecamion, are nice...
    • Paul from Austin: This is very cool tech- and building platforms to withstand ocean swells and huricanes has been...
    • Kl: This research is for clean h2 production catalysts but might one day have an application for fuel cell production...
    • Kl: Curious why hydrogen(h2) would take more energy to push through a pipe than natural gas(ch4)? What journal...
  • Pages

    • About
  • Archives

    • 2013
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
    • 2012
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2011
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2010
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2009
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2008
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2007
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2006
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2005
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December

Clean Break is proudly powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).