<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Climate change increasing subsurface temperatures</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2009/03/09/climate-change-increasing-subsurface-temperatures/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2009/03/09/climate-change-increasing-subsurface-temperatures/</link>
	<description>Trends, happenings and innovations in the clean technology market</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:38:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Clean Future Energy</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2009/03/09/climate-change-increasing-subsurface-temperatures/comment-page-1/#comment-4726</link>
		<dc:creator>Clean Future Energy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanbreak.ca/?p=1556#comment-4726</guid>
		<description>Geothermal seems to be one of the cheapest options available and yet it gets very little press. A function of lobby economics no doubt.

If it would really cost just $1 million, surely a power company would be happy to fund it, in return for a first look at all the data. That has to be an investment worth making.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geothermal seems to be one of the cheapest options available and yet it gets very little press. A function of lobby economics no doubt.</p>
<p>If it would really cost just $1 million, surely a power company would be happy to fund it, in return for a first look at all the data. That has to be an investment worth making.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin legrand</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2009/03/09/climate-change-increasing-subsurface-temperatures/comment-page-1/#comment-4644</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin legrand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 19:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanbreak.ca/?p=1556#comment-4644</guid>
		<description>One notable contradiction is that if the earth is warmer than the air above it; the air temperatures should eventually reflect that change.  There is maybe a delay because the earth would release this extra heat slowly.  Maybe the temperature differences between the earth and the air reflects this delay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One notable contradiction is that if the earth is warmer than the air above it; the air temperatures should eventually reflect that change.  There is maybe a delay because the earth would release this extra heat slowly.  Maybe the temperature differences between the earth and the air reflects this delay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin legrand</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2009/03/09/climate-change-increasing-subsurface-temperatures/comment-page-1/#comment-4643</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin legrand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 19:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanbreak.ca/?p=1556#comment-4643</guid>
		<description>Apparently this article has drawn a big response at the TORstar website.  One point that has been criticized is that the surface air temperature has risen 0.5 degrees since 1990 and the ground temperature has risen 2 degrees (so states this study) and this is a discrepency.

Are there reasons for this discrepency grounded in science?  Lets look at the modes of heat transfer, convection, conduction and radiation.  The sun radiates heat to the earth and it absorbed and scattered by gases in the atmosphere and the surface air.  It is also absorbed by the solid earth. 

Earth is a solid mass and the air is a gas.  Solid objects absorb and retain heat much more effectively than gases.  This is why energy efficient homes and buildings utilize thermal mass (concrete or stone fixtures).  The temperature of the thermal mass becomes warmer than the ambient air around it and therefore radiate this excess heat to the indoor space.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently this article has drawn a big response at the TORstar website.  One point that has been criticized is that the surface air temperature has risen 0.5 degrees since 1990 and the ground temperature has risen 2 degrees (so states this study) and this is a discrepency.</p>
<p>Are there reasons for this discrepency grounded in science?  Lets look at the modes of heat transfer, convection, conduction and radiation.  The sun radiates heat to the earth and it absorbed and scattered by gases in the atmosphere and the surface air.  It is also absorbed by the solid earth. </p>
<p>Earth is a solid mass and the air is a gas.  Solid objects absorb and retain heat much more effectively than gases.  This is why energy efficient homes and buildings utilize thermal mass (concrete or stone fixtures).  The temperature of the thermal mass becomes warmer than the ambient air around it and therefore radiate this excess heat to the indoor space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Climate change increasing subsurface temperatures &#171; Energy Consulting</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2009/03/09/climate-change-increasing-subsurface-temperatures/comment-page-1/#comment-4637</link>
		<dc:creator>Climate change increasing subsurface temperatures &#171; Energy Consulting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 09:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanbreak.ca/?p=1556#comment-4637</guid>
		<description>[...] FUENTE - Cleanbreak - 09/03/09 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] FUENTE &#8211; Cleanbreak &#8211; 09/03/09 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
