gambling insider
  • Corporate Knights
  • Mad Like Tesla
  • Star Column
  • Wiki Me

Cleanbreak.ca logo

Trends, happenings and innovations in the clean technology market
« Is there enough residual biomass in Ontario to fuel a converted coal plant?
Chasing a fossil-fuel fugitive »

Geothermal in Alberta finally getting some push

It’s still a long shot, not technologically as much as politically, but more voices are beginning to speak out about the potential for geothermal heat and power generation in Alberta, a province that’s heavily dependent on coal and where the oil sands rely on clean gas to produce the dirtiest of liquid petro products.

The Pembina Institute came out with a report this month that explores the many ways Alberta could transition away from coal and toward more sustainable and cleaner forms of electricity generation. I was most impressed with the section on geothermal, given that in Canada there hasn’t been much interest in this renewable source of power, with the exception of yours truly and a dozen or so industry and academic folks who are trying to draw attention to this immense opportunity.

According to the Pembina report, “very little information has been gathered on the size of Alberta’s geothermal potential,” however “research data that is available shows that the potential is enormous.”

Pembina says there is an estimated 21 billion gigawatt-hours of energy released every year below the surface of Alberta at depths of less than 5 km. “Even with the conservation assumption that only 0.5 per cent of this potential is recoverable, it represents the equivalent of roughly 14 million megawatts of generating capacity.” That, it goes on the point out, is more than 1,100 times the current total installed generating capacity of Alberta. This doesn’t even include depths greater than 5 km, which could be tapped using enhanced or “engineered” geothermal systems (EGS).

When Pembina explores the barriers to implementation, we get explanations such as “lack of awareness” and “uncertain resource” because of insufficient research and data. There is also the issue of uncertain costs, not so much with conventional geothermal but with the use of EGS. Another barrier is the challenges of drilling to depths of several kilometres.

The first two barriers, of course, shouldn’t be there in the first place. There’s no reason why we can’t raise awareness and conduct more research around this promising form of renewable energy. Sadly, it’s not on the radar of federal politicians (though, to their credit, some bureacrats are working away in the background).

I met up with Canadian Natural Resources Minister Lisa Raitt last week, and when I mentioned geothermal as an opportunity in Alberta she was a deer in headlights. Meanwhile, her colleague Jim Prentice, environment minister, spent much of a speech last week in Calgary downplaying the potential of renewables and talking up the need to “do no harm” against companies in the oil patch. Let me repeat: This guy is environment minister.

On the other two barriers — uncertain costs and drilling challenges — Pembina had this to say:

On costs…

Costs are no less certain than CCS which has already received significant public investments both provincially and federally. The potentially vast scale of geothermal resources in Alberta warrants significant consideration in this same vein.

On drilling:

While wells of 1 or 2 kilometers deep are the norm in Alberta, many wells in Alberta are drilled to depths of 4 km and some as deep as 7 km. Alberta has significant experience in drilling and experimenting with new drilling techniques. Existing research programs should shift from conventional petroleum drilling to geothermal. Research dollars currently allocated to developing drilling capability in the oil patch should be reallocated to applying existing knowledge to geothermal applications.

It did, however, estimate the cost at $70 per megawatt-hour on the assumption 10,000 MW of geothermal was developed in the province. That’s slightly cheaper than its estimates for wind, which is variable. Geothermal, on the other hand, is more valuable as a baseload power source.

Bottom line: Let’s stop ignoring this amazing resource.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Tags: EGS, geothermal, Pembina

This entry was posted on Saturday, January 24th, 2009 at 3:14 pm and is filed under geothermal. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

8 Responses to “Geothermal in Alberta finally getting some push”

  1. Brown Bashes Obama: Don’t Make Ethics Rules You Won’t Follow — But As For Me Says:
    January 24th, 2009 at 5:37 pm

    [...] Clean Break » Blog Archive » Geothermal in Alberta finally getting … [...]

  2. Geothermal in Alberta Says:
    January 26th, 2009 at 9:45 am

    [...] In Canada, at least, Alberta is synonymous with fossil fuel production. As such, it is nice to see that the Pembina Institute has produced a report (PDF) looking into possibilities for sustainable energy production in the province. The Clean Break blog has a summary. [...]

  3. Clean Future Energy Says:
    January 26th, 2009 at 10:16 am

    If you add the new developments that are coming along in low temperature geothermal, the potential is even more vast.

    Example: UTC Power http://www.utcpower.com/fs/com/bin/fs_com_PowerHomePage/, makes a unit that can generate electricty from water of 90 degree centigrade.

    Raser technologies has used it for a power plant, and it seems to be commercially viable today.

  4. skyler Says:
    January 26th, 2009 at 3:08 pm

    excellent point on the drilling experience. what is Prentice talking about? ‘do no harm’ to companies who are reeking eco havoc on albertas air and water wtf? Anyways good on the Pembina institute for releasing the rerpot and good on you for brining it to the forefront.

  5. Colin Says:
    January 26th, 2009 at 6:37 pm

    There has been little interest in geothermal through most of Canada on the electical prodiction side, and also on the heating side, however there is one exception to the heating side.
    In Manitoba, where I live, there has been a strong industry grow up around the home heating with geothermal heat pumps. I recently had my house retrofited. It was paid for through a Manitoba Hydro Eco loan (a crown Corp.) and I am only one of 3500 home in the province who have done this in the past few years.

  6. New report looks at geothermal in Alberta, Canada | Think GeoEnergy Blog Says:
    January 27th, 2009 at 5:06 am

    [...] “Greening the Grid (PDF)” (Pembina Institute) via CleanBreak.ca Post Tags: Alberta, [...]

  7. ZeroCarbonCanada.ca » Blog Archive » Pembina geothermal report Says:
    February 10th, 2009 at 10:23 pm

    [...] Hamilton, Canada’s most astute observer of the burgeoning green economy, reviews a Pembina Institute report on Greening the Grid and zeroes in on an enormously important and mostly [...]

  8. Stan Says:
    July 22nd, 2009 at 5:23 pm

    I think it is fantastic how the stimulus funds are making a difference. They are being taken advantage of all the time with the installation of geothermal heat pumps to replace high energy heating and cooling systems.

  • Tyler Hamilton

    tyler Tyler Hamilton is editor-in-chief of Corporate Knights magazine and a business columnist for the Toronto Star, Canada's largest daily newspaper. In addition to this Clean Break blog, Tyler writes a weekly column of the same name that discusses trends, happenings and innovators in the clean technology and green energy market. This blog is a personal project started in April 2005. It is not an official blog of the newspaper.


    Check out my new book Mad Like Tesla: Underdog Inventors and Their Relentless Pursuit of Clean Energy, published by ECW Press.


    Follow Go2CleanBreak on Twitter

     Subscribe in a reader

    Subscribe by Email


    If you would like to inquire about speaking engagements, research and writing services, or general consulting services please contact Tyler at cleantechreporter(AT)gmail.com


  • Categories

    • biofuels (59)
    • carbon capture (31)
    • cleantech (65)
    • conservation (34)
    • education (9)
    • efficiency (74)
    • electric vehicles (84)
    • emissions (105)
    • energy storage (38)
    • Energy-From-Waste (EFW) (36)
    • events (4)
    • financing (23)
    • fuel cells (19)
    • geothermal (20)
    • green politics (81)
    • grid (35)
    • Main Page (1066)
    • nuclear (26)
    • ontario (145)
    • peak oil (16)
    • solar (108)
    • transportation (32)
    • Uncategorized (189)
    • water (25)
    • wave power (10)
    • wind (76)
  • Latest Comments

    • Ralph Perez: It might be an advantage to include a solar charging option for the battery. 1-In the form of a panel in...
    • Enoch: This is completely off subject, but I would be interested in comments regarding this article:...
    • Bruce Sharp: In spite of what I might have said recently, I don’t see our exchanges as laughable. I find your...
    • Tyler: If I didn’t understand and accept the need for objective measurement and peer-to-peer comparison, I...
    • Bruce Sharp: Tyler, With all do respect (this is admittedly a phrase used just before uttering something that might...
  • Pages

    • About
  • Archives

    • 2012
      • January
    • 2011
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2010
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2009
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2008
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2007
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2006
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2005
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December

Clean Break is proudly powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).