• Corporate Knights
  • Mad Like Tesla
  • Star Column
  • Wiki Me

Cleanbreak.ca logo

Trends, happenings and innovations in the clean technology market
« Public Service Announcement
France’s Schneider Electric scoops up Xantrex »

Concrete that sucks — CO2, that is

There’s a story in Technology Review about a Halifax, Nova Scotia-based company called Carbon Sense Solutions that has found a way to make precast concrete products CO2-sucking vacuums. The interesting thing about concrete is that over hundreds of years they absorb CO2, a natural process called carbonation. The amount of absorption partially offsets the CO2 emissions that result from the calcination of limestone during the manufacture of cement, which is a key active ingredient of concrete. One problem, however, is that during the earlier stages of carbonation the outer two or three millimetres of the concrete forms a hardened crust that significantly slows down CO2 absorption. What Carbon Sense claims to have done is packed hundreds of years of carbonation into as little as one hour, using a curing process that consumes dramatically less energy than conventional heat/steam curing (see presentation here). In fact, compared to steam curing, company CEO Robert Niven says his approach — building on 40 years of research at McGill University — uses up to 44 per cent less energy and 39 per cent less water.

Now, it only works with precast concrete products — i.e. prefab tunnels, manholes, septic tanks, walls, blocks and beams. Even concrete wind-turbine towers are precast. This represents between 10 to 15 per cent of the North American concrete market, which is predominantly ready-mix (i.e. construction folks mix it and mould it on site). In some European countries, however, precast is closer to 40 per cent of the market. Given we’re talking about a $125-billion global market annually, even 10 per cent is a market worth pursuing.

Frankly, it sounds too good to be true, given the cement and concrete industry represent more than 5 per cent of global CO2 emissions and something has to be done about it. If all precast operations used Carbon Sense’s process, it would sequester as much as 20 per cent of those emissions in concrete, says Niven. How could this be? Because a precast plant alone wouldn’t have enough emissions to feed the process. To maximize CO2 absortion, a precast plant would have to get more CO2 from the flue stacks of neighbouring industrial facilities — assuming ideal logistics. Niven also says the process could take advantage of a plan, originating from Alberta, to build a CO2 pipeline across Canada that would feed enhanced oil recovery projects and other industrial uses (yeah, when donkeys fly).

There’s no shortage of innovative companies tackling the concrete problem. CalStar, Calera, CO2 Solution — they all have their own interesting twist to greening up concrete’s dirty image. Hopefully one of them, 10 or 20 years from now, will prove that they have the secret sauce that matters. Niven says a pilot plant at a precast concrete facility in Nova Scotia should be announced shortly, and there are plans for a second pilot plant with a precast manufacturer in British Columbia.

Niven wouldn’t go into too much detail about the process, citing proprietary concerns, so let’s just hope the preliminary results from his first two pilot projects go far toward supporting his claims.

Share/Save/Bookmark

This entry was posted on Thursday, July 24th, 2008 at 11:20 pm and is filed under Main Page. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

2 Responses to “Concrete that sucks — CO2, that is”

  1. Anonymous Says:
    July 27th, 2008 at 10:18 am

    Concrete is one of most important inputs to the LCA of wind and solar generation. One of the first step for any large energy project is to build a batch plant on site.

    Kit P

  2. Anonymous Says:
    July 28th, 2008 at 7:33 pm

    Kit P: Great point. Can you point me toward some LCA studies of renewable energy technologies that actually break out the major sources of GHG emissions?

  • Tyler Hamilton

    tyler Tyler Hamilton is associate publisher and editor-in-chief of Corporate Knights magazine and former business columnist for the Toronto Star. This blog is a personal project started in April 2005.


    Check out my new book Mad Like Tesla: Underdog Inventors and Their Relentless Pursuit of Clean Energy, published by ECW Press.


    Follow Go2CleanBreak on Twitter

     Subscribe in a reader

    Subscribe by Email


    If you would like to inquire about speaking engagements, research and writing services, or general consulting services please contact Tyler at cleantechreporter(AT)gmail.com


  • Categories

    • biofuels (68)
    • carbon capture (35)
    • cleantech (86)
    • conservation (49)
    • education (13)
    • efficiency (102)
    • electric vehicles (96)
    • emissions (126)
    • energy storage (54)
    • Energy-From-Waste (EFW) (46)
    • events (5)
    • financing (26)
    • fuel cells (25)
    • geothermal (27)
    • green politics (87)
    • grid (45)
    • Main Page (1067)
    • nuclear (31)
    • ontario (183)
    • peak oil (18)
    • solar (120)
    • transportation (42)
    • Uncategorized (204)
    • water (33)
    • wave power (14)
    • wind (89)
  • Latest Comments

    • kevin legrand: Following the microgrid scene, I have always wondered about batteries vs hydrogen in terms of storage...
    • Kl: Ontario should be discussing pumped storage options.. Flywheels, temporal power, and batteries, ecamion, are nice...
    • Paul from Austin: This is very cool tech- and building platforms to withstand ocean swells and huricanes has been...
    • Kl: This research is for clean h2 production catalysts but might one day have an application for fuel cell production...
    • Kl: Curious why hydrogen(h2) would take more energy to push through a pipe than natural gas(ch4)? What journal...
  • Pages

    • About
  • Archives

    • 2013
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
    • 2012
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2011
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2010
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2009
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2008
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2007
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2006
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2005
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December

Clean Break is proudly powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).