• Corporate Knights
  • Mad Like Tesla
  • Star Column
  • Wiki Me

Cleanbreak.ca logo

Trends, happenings and innovations in the clean technology market
« $135 oil forces industry to embrace efficiency
Railpower gets thumbs up from California operators »

Enerkem-Greenfield to build waste-to-ethanol facility in Edmonton

Greenfield Ethanol, Canada’s largest ethanol producer, and gasification-system developer Enerkem announced this afternoon that they will jointly build and operate (and possibly own?) what they’re claiming will be the world’s first industrial-scale facility dedicated to converting municipal solid waste into ethanol. The $70 million plant is expected to be in operation by the end of 2010, and based on past presentations from Enerkem will process 100,000 metric tons of MSW per year — i.e. the residual stuff that’s left over and would otherwise go to landfill after recycling and composting. It will initially produce 36 million litres a year of ethanol (nearly 10 million gallons a year). The City of Edmonton, which is the capital of Alberta, has signed a 25-year contract with Greenfield/Enerkem to supply residual MSW to the plant. It’s unclear what kind of tipping fee Greenfield/Enerkem will get, but Enerkem claims its process is competitive with current landfilling costs, substantially reduces greenhouse gas emissions, and can divert more than 90 per cent of residual MSW from landfills.

The race is on. Rivals, such as Khosla Ventures-backed Coskata, have set similar targets. Coskata has plans to have a 50 million to 100 million gallon plant up and running by late 2010/early 2011. What’s interesting about the Edmonton project is that the municipality initially wanted to use the Enerkem process, under license to provincial utility Epcor, to produce syngas that would be used to produce electricity. But they decided, and it appears rather quickly, that producing ethanol made more sense economically than producing electricity. It begs the question for other municipalities that may be considering the electricity route.

What I like about this Edmonton project (and similar projects in the pipeline) is that it bypasses pretty much all the criticism currently around producing ethanol from food crops. It also eliminates a lot of transportation from the equation. Fact is, corn ethanol facilities tend to be located in the country where the corn is located, requiring lots of transportation to bring the corn to the facility, and then to take the ethanol to market. But producing ethanol from local MSW means the plant can be located near an existing landfill, so it adds virtually nothing to the transportation of feedstock. One can even envision mining the current landfill for feedstock, though I guess you wouldn’t get a tipping fee for that. And because the ethanol is produced near the city, it doesn’t have to go far to market. In Edmonton, greenhouse-gas reductions from the 25-year project will be the equivalent of taking 12,000 cars off the road.

Share/Save/Bookmark

This entry was posted on Thursday, June 26th, 2008 at 5:02 pm and is filed under Main Page. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

4 Responses to “Enerkem-Greenfield to build waste-to-ethanol facility in Edmonton”

  1. Anonymous Says:
    July 2nd, 2008 at 12:08 pm

    Anyone know about the catalyst that is used to convert the syngas to liquid alcohol?

    Is it expensive? energy intensive to produce? readily-available?

    Darklamp

  2. Anonymous Says:
    July 2nd, 2008 at 4:01 pm

    By definition a catalyst isn’t used up in a chemical process. Therefore even if expensive and energy intensive to produce, you’d only need to make the stuff once.

    -Matt the Engineer

  3. Anonymous Says:
    July 3rd, 2008 at 6:37 pm

    Tyler

    Rumors has the eestor permittivity testing announcement could be July 10th. The reason is the sec rule preventing US investors to invest in zenn until 40 days after the VC investment 15 million which is July 10th. I validated the rule and this is correct. There would be a lot of unhappy US investors if they announced sooner. We should know soon if this is true.

  4. plantesjardinsnature Says:
    August 18th, 2009 at 4:28 am

    Good project and i think it’s better then trying to get electricity

  • Tyler Hamilton

    tyler Tyler Hamilton is associate publisher and editor-in-chief of Corporate Knights magazine and former business columnist for the Toronto Star. This blog is a personal project started in April 2005.


    Check out my new book Mad Like Tesla: Underdog Inventors and Their Relentless Pursuit of Clean Energy, published by ECW Press.


    Follow Go2CleanBreak on Twitter

     Subscribe in a reader

    Subscribe by Email


    If you would like to inquire about speaking engagements, research and writing services, or general consulting services please contact Tyler at cleantechreporter(AT)gmail.com


  • Categories

    • biofuels (68)
    • carbon capture (35)
    • cleantech (86)
    • conservation (50)
    • education (13)
    • efficiency (102)
    • electric vehicles (97)
    • emissions (126)
    • energy storage (54)
    • Energy-From-Waste (EFW) (46)
    • events (5)
    • financing (27)
    • fuel cells (25)
    • geothermal (27)
    • green politics (89)
    • grid (45)
    • Main Page (1067)
    • nuclear (31)
    • ontario (185)
    • peak oil (18)
    • solar (121)
    • transportation (43)
    • Uncategorized (206)
    • water (33)
    • wave power (14)
    • wind (90)
  • Latest Comments

    • Rebecca Black: Ontario has it’s own ‘solar bond’ – up to $100,000 per investor, 5 year term,...
    • steve lapp: Cars are seen as problems, not solutions by many people now, including many of the current group of...
    • Paul C from Austin: I have read this before- most interesting. I wonder, especially for the younger segment, how much...
    • Andrea: I can see what you are saying, and certainly they needed to find a way to bring the municipalities back into...
    • steve lapp: Good summary of the changing RE landscape in Ontario. I think however, that it is unfortunate that the...
  • Pages

    • About
  • Archives

    • 2013
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
    • 2012
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2011
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2010
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2009
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2008
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2007
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2006
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2005
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December

Clean Break is proudly powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).