• Corporate Knights
  • Mad Like Tesla
  • Star Column
  • Wiki Me

Cleanbreak.ca logo

Trends, happenings and innovations in the clean technology market
« VC dollars now chasing fast battery charging
$135 oil forces industry to embrace efficiency »

Multibrid eyes Ontario for offshore turbine manufacturing

Multibrid, the German maker of the M5000 offshore wind turbine that is majority owned by French nuclear giant Areva, says it wants to build a turbine manufacturing plant in North America and believes Ontario is an ideal location. A Multibrid representative told reporters in Toronto today that there are 22 offshore wind projects proposed in North America, many of them to be located in the Great Lakes. He said southern Ontario is centrally located, has good highway, rail and waterway access through the St. Lawrence, has local steelmaking capacity, and has a skilled manufacturing base that makes it a strong candidate for a plant.

A recent report from Helimax Energy Inc. estimated there are 64 offshore wind sites on the Ontario side of the Great Lakes alone, representing 35,000 megawatts of development potential. To make Ontario even more attractive, Trillium Power — a Toronto company that wants to develop a 750 MW wind farm in Lake Ontario, and possibly a second of equal size — has created a buying consortium called Tai Wind. The consortium includes Trillium and Fisherman’s Energy of New Jersey, which is proposing two offshore projects off the coasts of Massachusetts and New Jersey. So far, Tai Wind represents a potential of 300 turbine purchases, but it is in talks with six other offshore developers about joining the consortium. With enough potential orders under its belt, Tai Wind hopes to assure Multibrid that there’s enough demand in the market to justify building its plant in Ontario. At the same time, consortium members would be assured easier access to offshore turbines that would otherwise have to come from Europe at greater expense and after a lengthy wait. As a developer, said Kourtoff, “you’re simply not going to get an offshore turbine unless you get a manufacturer here.”

Joshua Magee, a wind energy analyst with Emerging Energy Research, told me earlier that the idea of creating a buying consortium in North America for offshore wind turbines is an interesting strategy. “It would certainly be unique,” he said.

If Ontario wants the manufacturing — and after watching our automotive and forestry sectors get pummelled, believe me, it does — then it likely has to approve and sign a PPA for the Trillium project in Lake Ontario or some other Great Lakes offshore project. This would show its commitment to offshore, and give Multibrid some degree of certainty for local turbine demand. If the government isn’t prepared to purchase offshore wind power (and soon), one can only guess that Multibrid will look to other jurisdictions more willing to act. I just spoke this evening with Donna Cansfield, Ontario’s minister of natural resources, and she said she’s excited about the potential investment from Multibrid and is confident the government is ready to talk business.

Time, of course, is off the essence. If Ontario doesn’t jump I’m sure Michigan, or New York, or Ohio would be more than willing to welcome Multibrid. And indeed, there’s nothing stopping these states from trying to pre-empt any move to Ontario with attractive incentives. One thing for certain is that offshore wind in the Great Lakes is now in play, and it is Ontario’s opportunity to lose.

Share/Save/Bookmark

This entry was posted on Thursday, June 19th, 2008 at 10:36 pm and is filed under Main Page. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

7 Responses to “Multibrid eyes Ontario for offshore turbine manufacturing”

  1. Anonymous Says:
    June 20th, 2008 at 3:32 pm

    It is good to read you still have hope for Ontario. Unfortunately, I do not think Ontario will act fast enough to provide a fertile environment for Multibrid. Not unless Areva gives them some kind of deal on a nuke plant….

    Sorry for the cynicism. Just one of those days.

    Darklamp

  2. Anonymous Says:
    June 21st, 2008 at 7:04 pm

    I don’t have an opinion on how fast Ontario will act. I just know they have to act fast. They’ve basically just been handed an opportunity on a silver platter, and while I’m sure Multibrid wants some incentives to sweeten the deal, this appears on the surface a no-brainer for a province getting pummelled by the loss of auto-industry jobs.

  3. Anonymous Says:
    June 23rd, 2008 at 9:41 am

    If more of my tax dollars are wasted to support the non-economic, inefficient, landscape ruining wind power industry, I will SCREEEAAAMMM!!!!!!

  4. Anonymous Says:
    June 23rd, 2008 at 9:49 am

    Scream all you want…

  5. Anonymous Says:
    June 23rd, 2008 at 5:25 pm

    Unfortunately i think your last paragraph summarizes what will eventually happen…

    …when have we (Ontario) ever been ‘quick’ to grab opportunities???

  6. Anonymous Says:
    June 24th, 2008 at 1:43 am

    I don’t think so. The opposition of offshore windfarm in the US is huge. Just look at how bad the Cape Wind Project is going. If the US screws up the renewal of PTC, Ontairo may even be able to lure wind turbine manufacturers that planned to go to the US to come here. One of them in my mind is Nordex.

  7. Anonymous Says:
    June 26th, 2008 at 2:37 pm

    Hi Em,

    I think that climate change, and the more powerful storms that result from it, ruins landscapes. Derelict factories and coal-fired power plants aren’t much better. Maybe we could work towards these problems with wind power, which is neither uneconomic (esp. if there’s a carbon price through tax, cap and trade, or both) nor inefficient (offshore wind power will have a higher capacity factor than on-shore, and converting wind to electricity isn’t inefficient, it’s intermittent. It produces about 30% of its rated power on-shore because the wind doesn’t always blow at 50 km/h).

  • Tyler Hamilton

    tyler Tyler Hamilton is associate publisher and editor-in-chief of Corporate Knights magazine and former business columnist for the Toronto Star. This blog is a personal project started in April 2005.


    Check out my new book Mad Like Tesla: Underdog Inventors and Their Relentless Pursuit of Clean Energy, published by ECW Press.


    Follow Go2CleanBreak on Twitter

     Subscribe in a reader

    Subscribe by Email


    If you would like to inquire about speaking engagements, research and writing services, or general consulting services please contact Tyler at cleantechreporter(AT)gmail.com


  • Categories

    • biofuels (68)
    • carbon capture (35)
    • cleantech (86)
    • conservation (49)
    • education (13)
    • efficiency (102)
    • electric vehicles (96)
    • emissions (126)
    • energy storage (54)
    • Energy-From-Waste (EFW) (46)
    • events (5)
    • financing (26)
    • fuel cells (25)
    • geothermal (27)
    • green politics (87)
    • grid (45)
    • Main Page (1067)
    • nuclear (31)
    • ontario (183)
    • peak oil (18)
    • solar (120)
    • transportation (42)
    • Uncategorized (204)
    • water (33)
    • wave power (14)
    • wind (89)
  • Latest Comments

    • kevin legrand: Following the microgrid scene, I have always wondered about batteries vs hydrogen in terms of storage...
    • Kl: Ontario should be discussing pumped storage options.. Flywheels, temporal power, and batteries, ecamion, are nice...
    • Paul from Austin: This is very cool tech- and building platforms to withstand ocean swells and huricanes has been...
    • Kl: This research is for clean h2 production catalysts but might one day have an application for fuel cell production...
    • Kl: Curious why hydrogen(h2) would take more energy to push through a pipe than natural gas(ch4)? What journal...
  • Pages

    • About
  • Archives

    • 2013
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
    • 2012
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2011
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2010
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2009
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2008
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2007
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2006
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2005
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December

Clean Break is proudly powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).