<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Day4 Energy takes it public</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2007/12/07/day4-energy-takes-it-public/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2007/12/07/day4-energy-takes-it-public/</link>
	<description>Trends, happenings and innovations in the clean technology market</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 23:54:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2007/12/07/day4-energy-takes-it-public/comment-page-1/#comment-1676</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 00:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2007/12/07/day4-energy-takes-it-public/#comment-1676</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://energypriorities.com&quot;   rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;EnergyPriorities.com&lt;/a&gt; belongs on your list of Clean Links.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://energypriorities.com" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/energypriorities.com');"   rel="nofollow">EnergyPriorities.com</a> belongs on your list of Clean Links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2007/12/07/day4-energy-takes-it-public/comment-page-1/#comment-1675</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 21:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2007/12/07/day4-energy-takes-it-public/#comment-1675</guid>
		<description>As far as the difference it makes in the power getting to your inverter a 180W panel will deliver 180W (under STC).  The only difference is a 180W Day4 panel will be slightly smaller than a 180W multi-crystalline panel from another manufacturer.



</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as the difference it makes in the power getting to your inverter a 180W panel will deliver 180W (under STC).  The only difference is a 180W Day4 panel will be slightly smaller than a 180W multi-crystalline panel from another manufacturer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2007/12/07/day4-energy-takes-it-public/comment-page-1/#comment-1674</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 21:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2007/12/07/day4-energy-takes-it-public/#comment-1674</guid>
		<description>Day4 Energy does have a spec sheet on their website.  The module efficiency (not to be confused with cell efficiency) of their panels is 14% compared to 12% for most quality multi-crystalline panels.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Day4 Energy does have a spec sheet on their website.  The module efficiency (not to be confused with cell efficiency) of their panels is 14% compared to 12% for most quality multi-crystalline panels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2007/12/07/day4-energy-takes-it-public/comment-page-1/#comment-1673</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 00:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2007/12/07/day4-energy-takes-it-public/#comment-1673</guid>
		<description>Perhaps you could inquire as a Journalist as to how much of a difference their contact technology makes in terms of power delivered to the inverter module.  This seems like a stretch to me that the contact resistance would be a major source of power loss.

Just saying that the contact resistance is 10x less gives me no clue as to whether the savings for a 1KW system is going to be 50W or half a watt, because I don&#039;t know how much power is lost to contact resistance in a &quot;normal&quot; panel.  They should know, so it&#039;s odd they don&#039;t state that anywhere on their website.  Actually I suspect I know why they don&#039;t state it.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps you could inquire as a Journalist as to how much of a difference their contact technology makes in terms of power delivered to the inverter module.  This seems like a stretch to me that the contact resistance would be a major source of power loss.</p>
<p>Just saying that the contact resistance is 10x less gives me no clue as to whether the savings for a 1KW system is going to be 50W or half a watt, because I don&#8217;t know how much power is lost to contact resistance in a &#8220;normal&#8221; panel.  They should know, so it&#8217;s odd they don&#8217;t state that anywhere on their website.  Actually I suspect I know why they don&#8217;t state it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
