gambling insider
  • Corporate Knights
  • Mad Like Tesla
  • Star Column
  • Wiki Me

Cleanbreak.ca logo

Trends, happenings and innovations in the clean technology market
« BIOX announces IPO plans
Magic ‘shrooms… not what you think »

Nuclear reliable? Not as claimed

All I can say is that consumers, businesses and industry in Ontario are fortunate the weather hasn’t been too hot and sticky, because this province could find itself in a power crunch this summer if an extended heatwave hits. Not only are two nuclear reactors at the Pickering Generating Station out for most of the summer (and that’s after $2 billion in refurbs over the past few years), but one larger reactor at Bruce Power is currently out for a few days — that is, we’ve got about 1,900 megawatts of baseload power offline at the moment, during a season of high demand. And this comes a week after a unit at Pickering B and a unit at Darlington were down for repairs.

So much for stable nuclear.

Fine, this stuff happens. But it goes to show that nuclear isn’t as dependable as the industry claims, and that when problems do occur it leads to a massive chunk of generation being taken off the grid in one shot, leaving us far more vulnerable than a system designed around distributed generation.

BTW: A very insightful article here from the New York Times about the surging cost of building large power plants, whether they be nuclear, coal or natural gas. The culprit is a combination of higher metal and energy costs, but also a worsening shortage of labour that is driving up wages. The lesson in this article is that when a government tells you a project is going to cost $2 billion, it’s more likely to end up costing more than $3 billion. In the context of a nuclear renaissance, it means inflated costs for everything from component manufacturing to transportation to concrete pouring to the hiring of engineers — similar in many respects to what we’re seeing happening in the oil sands, where refineries and facilities there are also competing against the nuclear industry for materials and skills, and where costs have skyrocketed.

Share/Save/Bookmark

This entry was posted on Wednesday, July 11th, 2007 at 2:14 pm and is filed under Main Page. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

2 Responses to “Nuclear reliable? Not as claimed”

  1. Anonymous Says:
    July 17th, 2007 at 11:56 pm

    Hi Tyler, I have taken a little hiatus from commenting on your blog. It’s good to be back reading it.
    So there is nothing surprising about nuclear energy and the lack of reliability. Just follow this link to see the shutdowns at the Bruce Nuke Plant. I also believe that a decentralized grid is the way to go – producing power where it is needed most, utilizing renewable energy along with micro generation. It reduces line losses, breaks up the grid (no massive outages), and makes people more aware of how much energy they consume, because its visible to them.
    PS – how is the house hunt going?

  2. Anonymous Says:
    July 17th, 2007 at 11:58 pm

    http://www.brucepower.com/pagecontent.aspx?navuid=1212

  • Tyler Hamilton

    tyler Tyler Hamilton is editor-in-chief of Corporate Knights magazine and a business columnist for the Toronto Star, Canada's largest daily newspaper. In addition to this Clean Break blog, Tyler writes a weekly column of the same name that discusses trends, happenings and innovators in the clean technology and green energy market. This blog is a personal project started in April 2005. It is not an official blog of the newspaper.


    Check out my new book Mad Like Tesla: Underdog Inventors and Their Relentless Pursuit of Clean Energy, published by ECW Press.


    Follow Go2CleanBreak on Twitter

     Subscribe in a reader

    Subscribe by Email


    If you would like to inquire about speaking engagements, research and writing services, or general consulting services please contact Tyler at cleantechreporter(AT)gmail.com


  • Categories

    • biofuels (59)
    • carbon capture (31)
    • cleantech (65)
    • conservation (34)
    • education (9)
    • efficiency (74)
    • electric vehicles (85)
    • emissions (105)
    • energy storage (38)
    • Energy-From-Waste (EFW) (36)
    • events (4)
    • financing (23)
    • fuel cells (19)
    • geothermal (20)
    • green politics (81)
    • grid (35)
    • Main Page (1066)
    • nuclear (26)
    • ontario (146)
    • peak oil (16)
    • solar (108)
    • transportation (32)
    • Uncategorized (189)
    • water (25)
    • wave power (10)
    • wind (76)
  • Latest Comments

    • Ralph Perez: It might be an advantage to include a solar charging option for the battery. 1-In the form of a panel in...
    • Enoch: This is completely off subject, but I would be interested in comments regarding this article:...
    • Bruce Sharp: In spite of what I might have said recently, I don’t see our exchanges as laughable. I find your...
    • Tyler: If I didn’t understand and accept the need for objective measurement and peer-to-peer comparison, I...
    • Bruce Sharp: Tyler, With all do respect (this is admittedly a phrase used just before uttering something that might...
  • Pages

    • About
  • Archives

    • 2012
      • January
      • February
    • 2011
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2010
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2009
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2008
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2007
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2006
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2005
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December

Clean Break is proudly powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).