<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ontario releases climate plan&#8230; and it&#8217;s not bad</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2007/06/18/ontario-releases-climate-plan-and-its-not-bad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2007/06/18/ontario-releases-climate-plan-and-its-not-bad/</link>
	<description>Trends, happenings and innovations in the clean technology market</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:28:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2007/06/18/ontario-releases-climate-plan-and-its-not-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-1255</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 21:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2007/06/18/ontario-releases-climate-plan-and-its-not-bad/#comment-1255</guid>
		<description>video killed the radio star

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>video killed the radio star</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2007/06/18/ontario-releases-climate-plan-and-its-not-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-1254</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 15:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2007/06/18/ontario-releases-climate-plan-and-its-not-bad/#comment-1254</guid>
		<description>Agreed Tyler.  The province&#039;s commitment is only a jumping-off point for the rest of us to crank up our efforts.  I&#039;m looking forward to seeing how all the pieces start linking together -- clean tech, green products and services, municipal programs, community action, and individual commitment.  When we start linking a conservation movement with an emerging green economy, who knows what we can accomplish.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed Tyler.  The province&#8217;s commitment is only a jumping-off point for the rest of us to crank up our efforts.  I&#8217;m looking forward to seeing how all the pieces start linking together &#8212; clean tech, green products and services, municipal programs, community action, and individual commitment.  When we start linking a conservation movement with an emerging green economy, who knows what we can accomplish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2007/06/18/ontario-releases-climate-plan-and-its-not-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-1253</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 01:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2007/06/18/ontario-releases-climate-plan-and-its-not-bad/#comment-1253</guid>
		<description>Tyler,

I believe that optimism is essential when presented with huge challenges, but I must say that I have trouble sharing your enthusiasm (however limited) for this plan.

If the focus on automobile technology isn&#039;t credible - I agree with your comments - and the reductions in housing /building emissions is so minuscule, how can you get excited over the programme.  After all, transportation and buildings generate the majority of GHGs in this province.

Given our harsh environment, and the criticality of managing building climates (heating) in order to survive our winters, it seems to me that this is an area that we could focus on if leadership is McGuinty&#039;s goal.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tyler,</p>
<p>I believe that optimism is essential when presented with huge challenges, but I must say that I have trouble sharing your enthusiasm (however limited) for this plan.</p>
<p>If the focus on automobile technology isn&#8217;t credible &#8211; I agree with your comments &#8211; and the reductions in housing /building emissions is so minuscule, how can you get excited over the programme.  After all, transportation and buildings generate the majority of GHGs in this province.</p>
<p>Given our harsh environment, and the criticality of managing building climates (heating) in order to survive our winters, it seems to me that this is an area that we could focus on if leadership is McGuinty&#8217;s goal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

