<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Welcome to the &#8220;Green&#8221; Dome</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2007/03/30/welcome-to-the-green-dome/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2007/03/30/welcome-to-the-green-dome/</link>
	<description>Trends, happenings and innovations in the clean technology market</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:28:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2007/03/30/welcome-to-the-green-dome/comment-page-1/#comment-1084</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 07:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2007/03/30/welcome-to-the-green-dome/#comment-1084</guid>
		<description>If the payback comes in 3 years and it&#039;s 30% of original capital extra to the bottom line each year after that... and yet companies still don&#039;t act on it, what incentive do you think would get them to act?  This is already a no brainer ROI.  The problem is that it is probably such a drop in the bucket compared to their overall operations.  Making the payback time 2 years instead of 3 or even 1 year, probably isn&#039;t going to make that big of a difference... light bulbs simply aren&#039;t on the radar screens of most CEOs unless they are betting on PR value.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the payback comes in 3 years and it&#8217;s 30% of original capital extra to the bottom line each year after that&#8230; and yet companies still don&#8217;t act on it, what incentive do you think would get them to act?  This is already a no brainer ROI.  The problem is that it is probably such a drop in the bucket compared to their overall operations.  Making the payback time 2 years instead of 3 or even 1 year, probably isn&#8217;t going to make that big of a difference&#8230; light bulbs simply aren&#8217;t on the radar screens of most CEOs unless they are betting on PR value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2007/03/30/welcome-to-the-green-dome/comment-page-1/#comment-1086</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 04:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2007/03/30/welcome-to-the-green-dome/#comment-1086</guid>
		<description>Tyler - The Skydome will be glowing a different kind of green, even with all the energy retrofits due to a deal struck with Rogers and the Bruce Nuclear Power Plant to have them supply the dome with &#039;sustainable green energy&#039; *cough*. I&#039;m sure you know of the deal.. or not. (maybe already written on it.. sorry if I&#039;m recapping!). If the dome really wanted to do something, they would go with bullfrog, or even sign a deal with the new hydro project at the falls.
http://www.treehugger.com/files/2007/04/baseball_stadiu.php
I have commented over at TH, so I won&#039;t go into my personal feelings. I&#039;m not a nuke guy in general and am more a proponent to decentralizing the grid as necessary.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tyler &#8211; The Skydome will be glowing a different kind of green, even with all the energy retrofits due to a deal struck with Rogers and the Bruce Nuclear Power Plant to have them supply the dome with &#8216;sustainable green energy&#8217; *cough*. I&#8217;m sure you know of the deal.. or not. (maybe already written on it.. sorry if I&#8217;m recapping!). If the dome really wanted to do something, they would go with bullfrog, or even sign a deal with the new hydro project at the falls.<br />
<a href="http://www.treehugger.com/files/2007/04/baseball_stadiu.php" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/www.treehugger.com');" rel="nofollow">http://www.treehugger.com/files/2007/04/baseball_stadiu.php</a><br />
I have commented over at TH, so I won&#8217;t go into my personal feelings. I&#8217;m not a nuke guy in general and am more a proponent to decentralizing the grid as necessary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2007/03/30/welcome-to-the-green-dome/comment-page-1/#comment-1085</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 20:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2007/03/30/welcome-to-the-green-dome/#comment-1085</guid>
		<description>Heartening to read about this move to increase energy efficiency rather than purchase offsets, as has been done by other sports organizations / events. Great story.



</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heartening to read about this move to increase energy efficiency rather than purchase offsets, as has been done by other sports organizations / events. Great story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2007/03/30/welcome-to-the-green-dome/comment-page-1/#comment-1083</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 19:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2007/03/30/welcome-to-the-green-dome/#comment-1083</guid>
		<description>There are &#039;incentives&#039; that are used very effectively elsewhere in the world (but apparently not in Canada), such as increasing the cost of electricity. I think you&#039;d be amazed at how quickly large building owners would invest in energy saving technology if electricity prices weren&#039;t kept artificially low in North America.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are &#8216;incentives&#8217; that are used very effectively elsewhere in the world (but apparently not in Canada), such as increasing the cost of electricity. I think you&#8217;d be amazed at how quickly large building owners would invest in energy saving technology if electricity prices weren&#8217;t kept artificially low in North America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2007/03/30/welcome-to-the-green-dome/comment-page-1/#comment-1082</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 13:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2007/03/30/welcome-to-the-green-dome/#comment-1082</guid>
		<description>Nice story. What I wonder about is why the Ontario government doesn&#039;t provide more incentives for large building owners to install energy-efficient/saving technology. And why aren&#039;t there rules that compel office towers to turn off their lights at night?

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice story. What I wonder about is why the Ontario government doesn&#8217;t provide more incentives for large building owners to install energy-efficient/saving technology. And why aren&#8217;t there rules that compel office towers to turn off their lights at night?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

