<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CO2-based parking permits approved</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2007/01/30/co2-based-parking-permits-approved/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2007/01/30/co2-based-parking-permits-approved/</link>
	<description>Trends, happenings and innovations in the clean technology market</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:28:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2007/01/30/co2-based-parking-permits-approved/comment-page-1/#comment-957</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2007/01/30/co2-based-parking-permits-approved/#comment-957</guid>
		<description>And how such paving will increase the city&#039;s difficulty in achieving it&#039;s wet weather flow management plan objectives. Policies unintentionally negatively interacting. The smoke-free workplace laws creating heated patios in winter.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And how such paving will increase the city&#8217;s difficulty in achieving it&#8217;s wet weather flow management plan objectives. Policies unintentionally negatively interacting. The smoke-free workplace laws creating heated patios in winter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2007/01/30/co2-based-parking-permits-approved/comment-page-1/#comment-958</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 09:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2007/01/30/co2-based-parking-permits-approved/#comment-958</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s very good news and should be a very strong driver in people&#039;s choice of new car.

The London congestion charge is moving towards a CO2-based fee with a proposal for the most polluting cars paying </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s very good news and should be a very strong driver in people&#8217;s choice of new car.</p>
<p>The London congestion charge is moving towards a CO2-based fee with a proposal for the most polluting cars paying</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2007/01/30/co2-based-parking-permits-approved/comment-page-1/#comment-956</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 01:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2007/01/30/co2-based-parking-permits-approved/#comment-956</guid>
		<description>Many of the other London boroughs are considering doing the same. And Manchester is considering a Congestion Zone on the London model. There&#039;s a real domino effect going on with eco-measures.
What&#039;s best about the Richmond plan is that (unlike the congestion charge) it&#039;s being justified on purely carbon-emmissions terms. A first carbon tax?
However, as critics point out, it doesn&#039;t catch people with driveways. Some are considering paving their front yards to avoid the tax. Apparently, when you&#039;re already paying thousands extra for your car and fuel, a couple of hundred extra for parking is intolerable.
It remains to be seen whether people&#039;s paving their front yards will make the &lt;i&gt;tax&lt;/i&gt; more unpopular, or the people themselves.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many of the other London boroughs are considering doing the same. And Manchester is considering a Congestion Zone on the London model. There&#8217;s a real domino effect going on with eco-measures.<br />
What&#8217;s best about the Richmond plan is that (unlike the congestion charge) it&#8217;s being justified on purely carbon-emmissions terms. A first carbon tax?<br />
However, as critics point out, it doesn&#8217;t catch people with driveways. Some are considering paving their front yards to avoid the tax. Apparently, when you&#8217;re already paying thousands extra for your car and fuel, a couple of hundred extra for parking is intolerable.<br />
It remains to be seen whether people&#8217;s paving their front yards will make the <i>tax</i> more unpopular, or the people themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2007/01/30/co2-based-parking-permits-approved/comment-page-1/#comment-955</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 21:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2007/01/30/co2-based-parking-permits-approved/#comment-955</guid>
		<description>A great step.  The other big regulatory innovation I&#039;d like to see tried is a switch to pay-per-mile vehicle registration and pricing (I great idea I heard recently from Todd Littman at the Victoria Tranport Policy Institute.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A great step.  The other big regulatory innovation I&#8217;d like to see tried is a switch to pay-per-mile vehicle registration and pricing (I great idea I heard recently from Todd Littman at the Victoria Tranport Policy Institute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

