<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Government cleantech announcement: yawn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2007/01/17/government-cleantech-announcement-yawn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2007/01/17/government-cleantech-announcement-yawn/</link>
	<description>Trends, happenings and innovations in the clean technology market</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:38:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2007/01/17/government-cleantech-announcement-yawn/comment-page-1/#comment-868</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 07:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2007/01/17/government-cleantech-announcement-yawn/#comment-868</guid>
		<description>Glen Estill has an interesting blog post regarding a new Nuke Plant proposal for the Tar Sands... maybe this is what Harper is talking about when he&#039;s pushing the &quot;Clean Oil Sands&quot; topic. Scary stuff. Using Nukes to prop up the Alberta Oil Industry.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.biofuels.coop/windblog/?p=122#more-122&quot;  rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.biofuels.coop/windblog/?p=122#more-122 &lt;/a&gt;


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glen Estill has an interesting blog post regarding a new Nuke Plant proposal for the Tar Sands&#8230; maybe this is what Harper is talking about when he&#8217;s pushing the &#8220;Clean Oil Sands&#8221; topic. Scary stuff. Using Nukes to prop up the Alberta Oil Industry.<br />
<a href="http://www.biofuels.coop/windblog/?p=122#more-122" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/www.biofuels.coop');"  rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.biofuels.coop/windblog/?p=122#more-122" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/www.biofuels.coop');" rel="nofollow">http://www.biofuels.coop/windblog/?p=122#more-122</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2007/01/17/government-cleantech-announcement-yawn/comment-page-1/#comment-867</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 07:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2007/01/17/government-cleantech-announcement-yawn/#comment-867</guid>
		<description>So this is new money...

But what about his seemingly narrow vision of our energy future? Clean Coal, Clean Oil Sands, Co2 sequestration? Yikes! You can put the word &quot;Clean&quot; in front of anything to put on a new spin and extend its shelf life.

These technologies are all very very far away from being environmentally friendly.  Harper has a fixation on fossil fuels and seems to want to make the industries of Alberta proud by giving them continual breaks and reason for continuing on the path to global destruction... very scary.

And you mention the 2:1 ratio of public to SDTC... does this mean that giants such as the Oil / Gas industry will see the bulk (having  generous industry investment) while the budding renewable / sustainable technology industry gets the crumbs? Sounds a little biased to me.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So this is new money&#8230;</p>
<p>But what about his seemingly narrow vision of our energy future? Clean Coal, Clean Oil Sands, Co2 sequestration? Yikes! You can put the word &#8220;Clean&#8221; in front of anything to put on a new spin and extend its shelf life.</p>
<p>These technologies are all very very far away from being environmentally friendly.  Harper has a fixation on fossil fuels and seems to want to make the industries of Alberta proud by giving them continual breaks and reason for continuing on the path to global destruction&#8230; very scary.</p>
<p>And you mention the 2:1 ratio of public to SDTC&#8230; does this mean that giants such as the Oil / Gas industry will see the bulk (having  generous industry investment) while the budding renewable / sustainable technology industry gets the crumbs? Sounds a little biased to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2007/01/17/government-cleantech-announcement-yawn/comment-page-1/#comment-866</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 20:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2007/01/17/government-cleantech-announcement-yawn/#comment-866</guid>
		<description>It would be a shame (but not a surprise) for the government to duplicate the efforsts of SDTC.  If its a similar mandate then why not save on adminstation costs and bureaucracy.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be a shame (but not a surprise) for the government to duplicate the efforsts of SDTC.  If its a similar mandate then why not save on adminstation costs and bureaucracy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
