<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Grid-tie wind becomes cheaper, easier to install</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2006/06/28/grid-tie-wind-becomes-cheaper-easier-to-install/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2006/06/28/grid-tie-wind-becomes-cheaper-easier-to-install/</link>
	<description>Trends, happenings and innovations in the clean technology market</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:38:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey Ward</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2006/06/28/grid-tie-wind-becomes-cheaper-easier-to-install/comment-page-1/#comment-5014</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Ward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 21:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2006/06/28/grid-tie-wind-becomes-cheaper-easier-to-install/#comment-5014</guid>
		<description>I have a Skystream it did not make 20KW a month it broke after only 6 months SWWP will not stand behind it it was installed properly stay clear it is junk and once they have your money they could care less</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a Skystream it did not make 20KW a month it broke after only 6 months SWWP will not stand behind it it was installed properly stay clear it is junk and once they have your money they could care less</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rick</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2006/06/28/grid-tie-wind-becomes-cheaper-easier-to-install/comment-page-1/#comment-3226</link>
		<dc:creator>rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2006/06/28/grid-tie-wind-becomes-cheaper-easier-to-install/#comment-3226</guid>
		<description>This is great for rural places, when will there be instant grid-tied systems for the urban homeowner?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is great for rural places, when will there be instant grid-tied systems for the urban homeowner?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2006/06/28/grid-tie-wind-becomes-cheaper-easier-to-install/comment-page-1/#comment-486</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 21:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2006/06/28/grid-tie-wind-becomes-cheaper-easier-to-install/#comment-486</guid>
		<description>Rebates definitely play a role. The company says this will vary from state to state, or province to province for that matter. In Ontario, on the assumption you could get 11 cents per kilowatt-hour, I figure it would take 15 years or so for a payback. You&#039;re right, that doesn&#039;t sound so good. So rebates are key.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rebates definitely play a role. The company says this will vary from state to state, or province to province for that matter. In Ontario, on the assumption you could get 11 cents per kilowatt-hour, I figure it would take 15 years or so for a payback. You&#8217;re right, that doesn&#8217;t sound so good. So rebates are key.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2006/06/28/grid-tie-wind-becomes-cheaper-easier-to-install/comment-page-1/#comment-485</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 19:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2006/06/28/grid-tie-wind-becomes-cheaper-easier-to-install/#comment-485</guid>
		<description>Tyler, I am confused by the economic calculation in your story. If, as the article states, the saving is $500 to $800/yr, and the system costs are $8000 to $10,000, how can the payback period be 5 to 12 years without investment rebates? It looks more like a 10 to 20 yr payback to me, even with 0% financing (or if the interest rate is the same as the energy inflation rate). Am I missing something?

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tyler, I am confused by the economic calculation in your story. If, as the article states, the saving is $500 to $800/yr, and the system costs are $8000 to $10,000, how can the payback period be 5 to 12 years without investment rebates? It looks more like a 10 to 20 yr payback to me, even with 0% financing (or if the interest rate is the same as the energy inflation rate). Am I missing something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
