<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Solar energy report: Crossing the $1 per watt barrier</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2006/05/11/solar-energy-report-crossing-the-1-per-watt-barrier/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2006/05/11/solar-energy-report-crossing-the-1-per-watt-barrier/</link>
	<description>Trends, happenings and innovations in the clean technology market</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:38:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2006/05/11/solar-energy-report-crossing-the-1-per-watt-barrier/comment-page-1/#comment-415</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 17:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2006/05/11/solar-energy-report-crossing-the-1-per-watt-barrier/#comment-415</guid>
		<description>Not quite, because of the time value of money.  At a 7% discount rate per year,  the 30-year cost with 10-year life cells is:

$1 + $1/(1.07^10)+$1/(1.07^20) = $1.76

So a 30-year cell would have to cost $1.76 to be preferable to a 10-year life cell costing $1.

You&#039;re right, though, to compare useful life to purchase cost.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not quite, because of the time value of money.  At a 7% discount rate per year,  the 30-year cost with 10-year life cells is:</p>
<p>$1 + $1/(1.07^10)+$1/(1.07^20) = $1.76</p>
<p>So a 30-year cell would have to cost $1.76 to be preferable to a 10-year life cell costing $1.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right, though, to compare useful life to purchase cost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2006/05/11/solar-energy-report-crossing-the-1-per-watt-barrier/comment-page-1/#comment-416</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2006 14:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2006/05/11/solar-energy-report-crossing-the-1-per-watt-barrier/#comment-416</guid>
		<description>I also wonder what the rising costs of fossil fuel energy will do to the price of production of solar panels; isn&#039;t production of solar panels very energy-intensive?

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also wonder what the rising costs of fossil fuel energy will do to the price of production of solar panels; isn&#8217;t production of solar panels very energy-intensive?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2006/05/11/solar-energy-report-crossing-the-1-per-watt-barrier/comment-page-1/#comment-414</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 16:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2006/05/11/solar-energy-report-crossing-the-1-per-watt-barrier/#comment-414</guid>
		<description>always remember to combine price with useful life.  $3/watt with a 30 year life is equivalent to $1/watt with a 10 year life.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>always remember to combine price with useful life.  $3/watt with a 30 year life is equivalent to $1/watt with a 10 year life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
