Comments on: Canadian BioOil tech flows to eastern Europe

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 03 Apr 2006 01:16:45 +0000

Can I name a publicly traded company that does exactly what DynaMotive does? No, but it’s best to view DynaMotive in the broader competitive landscape, competing against companies that have other approaches to biomass-to-energy conversion — i.e. biodiesel, ethanol, hydrogen, methane, syngas, etc… Anyway, that’s all besides the point. The debate here is about over-valuation, and DynaMotive is overvalued — until the company shows a profit and a track record of tripled digit revenue growth.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 03 Apr 2006 00:28:40 +0000

Your point are well taken. You are right you cannot compare DYMTF to Google..kinda stupid…then name three companies that compete with DYMTF ? I can’t find one.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 01 Apr 2006 15:13:25 +0000

Everybody any his brother is going after the fossil fuel-replacement market that has been identified in the United States, Canada, and other countries. The comment, “market cap is not important at this time” is kind of silly, as is the comparison to Google, since Google is a very profitable company that pulls in billions of dollars in revenues. You’re comparing apples to oranges. Most of the companies I cover in this blog have the potential you described. DynaMotive is an interesting story, but not so unique as to justify that market cap or such investor boosterism.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 01 Apr 2006 14:28:49 +0000

DYMTF- Market Cap: Company has been In R&D for the past 8+ years and this is the first revenue..watch it grow. As for the cap ? sure it is high but it should be $1 billion cap. According to the the US Dept of Energy and USDA bio oil can replace 30 % of US fossil fuel requirements. Market cap is not important at this time…look at Google…so it means nothing. Management and execution of the business plan is the important thing…watch revenues grow 100 % ++ per month.