• Corporate Knights
  • Mad Like Tesla
  • Star Column
  • Wiki Me

Cleanbreak.ca logo

Trends, happenings and innovations in the clean technology market
« Railpower enters new phase…
DynaMotive moves forward with Nova Scotia bio-oil facility »

Kyocera “spherical silicon” approach sounds familiar

Seems ATS Automation’s Spheral Solar isn’t the only one using tiny silicon balls in the production of solar PV cells. Kyocera, the world’s second-largest solar cell manufacturer, plans to start shipping a lower-cost solar panel early next year that uses one-fifth the silicon of its traditional panels. “The new panel sharply reduces silicon usage by lining up spherical silicon measuring 1mm or less in diameter on non-silicon substrate,” according to an AsiaPulse report. “The design also eliminates the need to cut the panel to make finished products, sharply lowering material waste.”

At first glance it seems remarkably similar to Spheral Solar’s approach, as described in an article I wrote in July 2004:

“At the heart of Spheral Solar’s technology are tiny silicon balls that look like poppy seeds. The ‘seeds’ come from scrap silicon used by the semiconductor industry, and each one is capable of capturing sunlight and converting it into electricity. A unique property of silicon is that, when melted, tiny spherical balls are naturally formed. Spheral Solar takes those mini-spheres and drops them into holes that have been punched into a flexible aluminium sheet. It then bonds another aluminium sheet to the top and coats the whole strip with a Teflon-protected plastic coasting.”

It’s no secret that solar PV panel manufacturers are looking for ways to not only reduce costs but to also reduce their reliance on silicon. Minimizing waste, and using less silicon that is also lower grade accomplishes the goal quite well for Kyocera and Spheral Solar.

It’s difficult to say whether Kyocera, by using this approach, is good or bad news for Spheral. On the one hand Kyocera is a serious player and competitive threat. However, Spheral Solar has an edge because its product has a head-start, and by entering the market Kyocera may in fact lend credibility to Spheral Solar’s product.

Sprott Securities analyst MacMurray Whale points out that the two have significantly different manufacturing approaches and architectures but are “mighty close” from a superficial level. It’s possible, he says, that Spheral Solar will be motivated to move much faster into the market in light of Kyocera’s plans, but the key will be Spheral Solar’s ability to have its product integrated into building materials.

Share/Save/Bookmark

This entry was posted on Tuesday, November 29th, 2005 at 10:06 pm and is filed under Main Page. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

One Response to “Kyocera “spherical silicon” approach sounds familiar”

  1. Anonymous Says:
    December 1st, 2005 at 10:38 am

    Kyosemi is also producing spheral solar panels, and opened their first US sales office last month. I’m no technical expert, but it seems the difference between ATS’s spheral technology and Kyosemi’s is that ATS embeds its spheres in aluminum, whereas Kyosemi does so in plastic. So ATS’s patent on spheral technology isn’t as strong as it seems – substitute something functional other than aluminum and you can make spheral panels

    -lope

  • Tyler Hamilton

    tyler Tyler Hamilton is associate publisher and editor-in-chief of Corporate Knights magazine and former business columnist for the Toronto Star. This blog is a personal project started in April 2005.


    Check out my new book Mad Like Tesla: Underdog Inventors and Their Relentless Pursuit of Clean Energy, published by ECW Press.


    Follow Go2CleanBreak on Twitter

     Subscribe in a reader

    Subscribe by Email


    If you would like to inquire about speaking engagements, research and writing services, or general consulting services please contact Tyler at cleantechreporter(AT)gmail.com


  • Categories

    • biofuels (68)
    • carbon capture (35)
    • cleantech (86)
    • conservation (49)
    • education (13)
    • efficiency (102)
    • electric vehicles (96)
    • emissions (126)
    • energy storage (54)
    • Energy-From-Waste (EFW) (46)
    • events (5)
    • financing (26)
    • fuel cells (25)
    • geothermal (27)
    • green politics (87)
    • grid (45)
    • Main Page (1067)
    • nuclear (31)
    • ontario (183)
    • peak oil (18)
    • solar (120)
    • transportation (42)
    • Uncategorized (204)
    • water (33)
    • wave power (14)
    • wind (89)
  • Latest Comments

    • kevin legrand: Following the microgrid scene, I have always wondered about batteries vs hydrogen in terms of storage...
    • Kl: Ontario should be discussing pumped storage options.. Flywheels, temporal power, and batteries, ecamion, are nice...
    • Paul from Austin: This is very cool tech- and building platforms to withstand ocean swells and huricanes has been...
    • Kl: This research is for clean h2 production catalysts but might one day have an application for fuel cell production...
    • Kl: Curious why hydrogen(h2) would take more energy to push through a pipe than natural gas(ch4)? What journal...
  • Pages

    • About
  • Archives

    • 2013
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
    • 2012
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2011
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2010
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2009
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2008
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2007
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2006
      • January
      • February
      • March
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December
    • 2005
      • April
      • May
      • June
      • July
      • August
      • September
      • October
      • November
      • December

Clean Break is proudly powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).