<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Railpower goes boatpower</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2005/09/06/railpower-goes-boatpower/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2005/09/06/railpower-goes-boatpower/</link>
	<description>Trends, happenings and innovations in the clean technology market</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:28:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2005/09/06/railpower-goes-boatpower/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2005 16:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2005/09/06/railpower-goes-boatpower/#comment-52</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re absolutely right to be confused. That excerpt from my July article was a bit misleading, if not wrong. The recapturing of energy would apply to a Prius-like system. The reason why RailPower&#039;s technology is ideal is not because of energy recapture potential, but because a hybrid-electric design (i.e. large batteries aided by a genset) is best suited -- i.e. more efficient -- for frequent start-stop routines of shipyard locomotives and marine vessels like tugboats. Rather than have a huge engine, you can have a small generator and massive batteries that together require less maintenance and release far fewer emissions and particulates.

Thanks for pointing that out...

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re absolutely right to be confused. That excerpt from my July article was a bit misleading, if not wrong. The recapturing of energy would apply to a Prius-like system. The reason why RailPower&#8217;s technology is ideal is not because of energy recapture potential, but because a hybrid-electric design (i.e. large batteries aided by a genset) is best suited &#8212; i.e. more efficient &#8212; for frequent start-stop routines of shipyard locomotives and marine vessels like tugboats. Rather than have a huge engine, you can have a small generator and massive batteries that together require less maintenance and release far fewer emissions and particulates.</p>
<p>Thanks for pointing that out&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2005/09/06/railpower-goes-boatpower/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2005 16:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2005/09/06/railpower-goes-boatpower/#comment-51</guid>
		<description>I do NOT get this.  Wheeled vehicles have brakes, and energy is recaptured though regenerative braking.  I&#039;ve never heard of a boat with brakes.  When water resistance does not slow forward momentum, reverse thrust is required.

How the heck do they &quot;recapture&quot; energy?

The fact that the talk about multi-engine systems makes more sense, a little engine to get around, and a big one to push.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do NOT get this.  Wheeled vehicles have brakes, and energy is recaptured though regenerative braking.  I&#8217;ve never heard of a boat with brakes.  When water resistance does not slow forward momentum, reverse thrust is required.</p>
<p>How the heck do they &#8220;recapture&#8221; energy?</p>
<p>The fact that the talk about multi-engine systems makes more sense, a little engine to get around, and a big one to push.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

